Red Vector gives security teams the context to distinguish real threats from noise, before damage is done.
The Trust Center provides self-service access to Red Vector's certifications, audit reports, and security practices documentation. We apply the same principle to our own transparency that we advocate for our customers: trust built on evidence, not assertions.
Avg. cost of insider threat per org
Avg. time to detect an incident
Avg. cost of a data breach
The Trust section establishes Red Vector's commitment to privacy, ethics, information security, and transparency. For a platform that monitors behavioral risk signals across an organization's workforce, trust is not a marketing position. It is the foundation that makes everything else defensible.
Red Vector's approach to behavioral monitoring is governed by three principles that are embedded in the platform's architecture, not just its policies.
Organizational response to behavioral risk conditions must be calibrated to the severity and confidence of those conditions. The advisory/watch/warning framework enforces proportionality by design. An advisory does not trigger an investigation. A watch increases preparedness. Only a warning with high model consensus warrants direct protective action. The platform never recommends disproportionate responses, and the governance committee ensures that every action is calibrated to the evidence.
Organizational monitoring of behavioral telemetry is disclosed through notice and transparency mechanisms. Employees are informed that behavioral risk signals are monitored for security purposes. Covert monitoring is not a baseline capability. It is permitted only in rare, predicate-based investigations with explicit legal approval, defined scope, and time-bound authorization. Transparency is not optional. It is a structural commitment.
Multi-disciplinary governance committee review of active watchlists, escalation histories, intervention outcomes, and exception logs. No single function, including cybersecurity, has unilateral authority over behavioral risk response. Oversight is a continuous process, not a periodic review. The governance committee ensures that the platform operates within its authorized boundaries at all times.
The platform collects only the minimum data necessary to produce the behavioral assessment. This is not a policy aspiration. It is an architectural constraint enforced by technical design.
Baseline telemetry collection is limited to metadata: authentication events, access records, authorization changes, and data movement indicators. Content inspection is off by default. Collection beyond baseline metadata requires an escalation gate with documented predicate and analyst or legal approval. The system is designed to answer the question 'What is happening?' not 'What was said?'
Multi-disciplinary governance committee review of active watchlists, escalation histories, intervention outcomes, and exception logs. No single function, including cybersecurity, has unilateral authority over behavioral risk response. Oversight is a continuous process, not a periodic review. The governance committee ensures that the platform operates within its authorized boundaries at all times.
Behavioral data is retained according to a defined schedule aligned with organizational policy and regulatory requirements. Legal hold mechanisms preserve data when required for investigation or litigation. When retention periods expire, deletion is assured and verifiable. The governance committee reviews and approves the retention schedule annually.
FULCRUM™ processes some of the most sensitive behavioral and organizational data in your environment. The platform's own security architecture reflects the same rigor we bring to protecting your organization.
FULCRUM™'s security architecture is built on defense-in-depth principles with encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access controls, immutable audit logging, and continuous security monitoring.
All data at rest and in transit is encrypted using current industry-standard protocols. Encryption key management follows established best practices with separation of duties, rotation schedules, and audit trails for key access.
Platform access is governed by role-based access controls that enforce strict segregation. Security analysts see behavioral scores and technical telemetry. HR sees employment context relevant to their function. Legal sees governance and compliance artifacts. No single role has unrestricted access to all data categories. Access is audited and reviewed on a defined cadence.
FULCRUM™'s security posture is validated against industry-standard compliance frameworks applicable to the environments in which the platform operates.
SOC 2 Type II compliance validates that the platform maintains the security, availability, and confidentiality controls required for enterprise and government deployment.
ISO 27001 alignment provides the internationally recognized information security management framework that multinational customers and government agencies require.
FedRAMP Alignment
FedRAMP alignment positions FULCRUM™ for deployment in federal government environments where cloud security authorization is a prerequisite for procurement.
The Trust Center provides self-service access to Red Vector's certifications, audit reports, and security practices documentation. We apply the same principle to our own transparency that we advocate for our customers: trust built on evidence, not assertions.
Current certifications including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 alignment, and industry-specific certifications applicable to defense, critical infrastructure, and financial services deployments. Certification documentation is available for review upon request and under NDA where required.
Third-party audit reports that validate the platform's security controls, data handling practices, and compliance posture. Available to prospective and current customers through the Trust Center with appropriate access controls.
Documentation of Red Vector's internal security practices, including vulnerability management, incident response procedures, employee security training, and supply chain security controls. Designed to satisfy the security questionnaire and due diligence requirements of enterprise procurement processes.
Comprehensive technical documentation for security engineers, integration architects, and platform administrators. All documentation is maintained in sync with the current platform release.
Platform architecture guides, deployment procedures, configuration reference, and operational best practices. Technical documentation is designed for the security engineers and IT administrators responsible for deploying and maintaining the FULCRUM™ platform within your environment.
Complete API documentation including endpoint specifications, authentication methods, request/response schemas, rate limits, and code examples. API references support bidirectional integration with SIEM, SOAR, IAM, DLP, case management, and HR platforms.
Step-by-step integration guides for major security platforms, including pre-built connectors, configuration templates, and validation procedures. Integration guides are organized by platform and include estimated deployment time, prerequisites, and troubleshooting references.
Downloadable docs and policy links. These live as linked rows rather than prose so they are easy to scan and access quickly.
